Allahabad High Court's Stern Remark: Judges Forced to Work Like Inquiry Counter Clerks

The Allahabad High Court has taken a firm stance on a serious issue encountered during the hearing of criminal cases. The court observed that paper books are not being provided on time in criminal appeals, leading to frequent requests for hearings to be adjourned. Expressing its frustration, the court stated that such a situation is inappropriate for the judicial process.

The court remarked that due to the unavailability of paper books, judges are being forced to work like clerks at an inquiry counter instead of performing their primary judicial roles. This situation is not only a waste of time but also raises questions about the efficiency of the justice delivery system. The court has taken this matter seriously and reprimanded the parties involved.

According to a report by Amar Ujala Network, Prayagraj, the High Court has clarified that such obstacles in judicial work are unacceptable. The court has issued strict instructions to curb the tendency of repeatedly seeking adjournments. The court believes that ensuring the availability of paper books is the responsibility of the administration so that judges are not entangled in unnecessary tasks.

The court emphasized that delays in the judicial process cause distress to litigants. Unless the necessary documents and paper books are prepared, cases cannot be resolved in a time-bound manner. This remark by the High Court is being seen as a significant step toward judicial reform.

The court expressed hope that such a situation will not arise in the future and that the concerned departments will take immediate corrective measures. To maintain judicial dignity, it is essential that judges receive an environment conducive to performing their core duties.

This matter also highlights the lack of transparency and efficiency in court operations. Following this sharp remark from the High Court, pressure has mounted on the concerned officials to rectify the system.

Finally, the court clarified that delays in justice are not only a violation of the law but also affect the public's trust. The High Court has given strong signals for further action in this matter to ensure that such obstacles do not occur during hearings in the future.