Madras High Court advises media: Dignity and privacy are more important than the TRP race

The Madras High Court recently made a significant observation, reminding media organizations of their responsibilities. During the hearing of a POCSO case involving R. Veermani, the court raised serious objections to certain videos broadcast by TV channels. The court believes that instead of creating sensations, the media should prioritize the privacy of victims and legal boundaries.

During the proceedings, the judges stated that in the race for TRPs, the media often crosses boundaries set by law and ethics. The court emphasized that there are things far more important in society than TRPs, with individual dignity and the impartiality of the judicial process being paramount.

According to a BBC Hindi report, the court warned the media to exercise extreme caution while reporting on any case. Disclosing the identity of victims or showing misleading footage in sensitive cases like POCSO is not only illegal but also has a negative impact on society.

The court reminded media houses that they are the fourth pillar of democracy and are expected to work responsibly. Reporting in haste or using sensitive content to boost TRPs is not in the interest of justice.

It was also clarified in the judicial observation that the media should understand that court proceedings and investigations have their own processes. Unnecessary interference or sensational presentation by the media can affect the investigation.

Finally, the court urged media organizations to review their editorial policies. The judiciary has given clear signals that if the media crosses its line, it may face legal consequences. This observation serves as a stern message to the media world not to place commercial ambitions above human values.